Single managed or seen as two?
-
lligetfa - Associate
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2014 12:12 pm
- Location: Fort Frances Ont. Canada
- Has thanked: 305 times
- Been thanked: 381 times
Single managed or seen as two?
Will this Tower Switch be managed as a single entity or will it just be two switches with a fibre link? I assume some sort on IDU/ODU where IDU is the base and ODU is the topside.
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7347
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1597 times
- Been thanked: 1318 times
Re: Single managed or seen as two?
lligetfa wrote:Will this Tower Switch be managed as a single entity or will it just be two switches with a fibre link? I assume some sort on IDU/ODU where IDU is the base and ODU is the topside.
A single device!
![Thumbs Up :thumbsup:](./images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
-
lligetfa - Associate
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2014 12:12 pm
- Location: Fort Frances Ont. Canada
- Has thanked: 305 times
- Been thanked: 381 times
Re: Single managed or seen as two?
OK, thanks.
I'm guessing that if you decide to go ahead with the Tower Switch Mini, that it and the base WISP Switch will be seen as two. I'm OK with that since that is how it would be with TOUGHswitches now.
I'm guessing that if you decide to go ahead with the Tower Switch Mini, that it and the base WISP Switch will be seen as two. I'm OK with that since that is how it would be with TOUGHswitches now.
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7347
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1597 times
- Been thanked: 1318 times
Re: Single managed or seen as two?
That is still being debated.
We think the Master switch will at least have a quick link to the sub switches but we may make it allow configuration within the master.![Idea :idea:](./images/smilies/icon_idea.gif)
We think the Master switch will at least have a quick link to the sub switches but we may make it allow configuration within the master.
![Idea :idea:](./images/smilies/icon_idea.gif)
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
-
rebelwireless - Experienced Member
- Posts: 607
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 1:46 pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 136 times
Re: Single managed or seen as two?
at one of my sites I have an rb493g and 2 toughswitches. I'm using QinQ to bring ports from the toughswitches to the rb493g so that I can manage those ports from the 'tik. I really like the idea of having the tower switch(s) seamlessly managed from the main switch.
just my $.02
just my $.02
-
lligetfa - Associate
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2014 12:12 pm
- Location: Fort Frances Ont. Canada
- Has thanked: 305 times
- Been thanked: 381 times
Re: Single managed or seen as two?
rebelwireless wrote:I really like the idea of having the tower switch(s) seamlessly managed from the main switch.
I was going on the premise of beggars can't be choosers and that there is no seamless management with TS cascaded, but hey, if there was seamless management, that would set it a few notches above for sure!
I really liked being able to centrally manage and monitor a bunch of HP ProCurve switches with PCM+. All the other switches were managed individually either through CL or text based menus.
6 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests