Page 2 of 2

Re: VLANS, bonded interfaces, Netonix and Mikrotik

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:37 am
by sirhc
Well I would always use a mid-span injector configuration using 2 switch ports for any backhaul links. Never run traffic through the same interface to the router as traffic going from router to local radios on the tower such as APs and private PTP links such as high end customers.

I give this same advice in this post:
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=2604&p=18261&hilit=+local+radios#p18261

Review this post: viewtopic.php?t=1654&p=12766#p12766

And review this thread: viewtopic.php?f=30&t=452

And watch the video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JvBEAD4MFM

As far as MT routers I I have no experience with as we use Cisco routers at my WISP, a Cisco 2951 at each tower.

Re: VLANS, bonded interfaces, Netonix and Mikrotik

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 8:58 pm
by jg0007
Ok Chris you recommend doing the link aggregation with two switch this aggregation that we intend to perform is backhaul links from the main point towards the distribution towers

Re: VLANS, bonded interfaces, Netonix and Mikrotik

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 11:15 pm
by sirhc
jg0007 wrote:Ok Chris you recommend doing the link aggregation with two switch this aggregation that we intend to perform is backhaul links from the main point towards the distribution towers


That is not what I said in any of those post / links above? - RE-READ ABOVE

Re: VLANS, bonded interfaces, Netonix and Mikrotik

Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 8:50 pm
by jg0007
Hello I have echo link aggregation (two Airfiber links) now as I can access the arrivals that are in the aggregation
I have cables connected in the port of manager of each airfiber until the ports of the netonix in each ends